Washington DC: Independent Evaluation Group (IEG), World Bank (IEG Working Paper no. 7) 78 p.
This study compares the evolution of the state-of-the-art in research and analysis of anticorruption and transparency with World Bank practice. The first part of the paper reviews the theoretical and empirical approaches that have influenced the World Bank's and the donor community's thinking on how to diagnose and fight corruption. Also covered are interventions and diagnostic tools that have been developed to improve governance and assess corruption, as well as recent Bank-supported international initiatives to curb grand corruption. Thereafter, the paper analyzes experiences from the Bank's engagement in anti-corruption, drawing on the results of 19 country case studies covering developing and transitional countries. From the country cases it appears that anti-corruption measures are too often proposed by the Bank without considerations of the political economy and without clear strategies to win the support of a critical mass of key leaders who would help overcome the inevitable opposition of vested interests.
Evidence from the country cases are used to highlight past pitfalls and propose directions for future support to governance and anti-corruption reforms. First, the Bank needs to do more to understand corruption in the particular country context. The priorities for anticorruption efforts need to be based on an assessment in each country of the types of corruption most harmful to development. Second, direct measures to reduce corruption, such as the establishment of anti-corruption commissions, rarely succeed since they often lack the required support from political elites and the judicial system. Third, linking governance work with visible public service improvements may help build the credibility of reforms as from the point of view of citizens and government. Fourth, sustaining efforts to reduce corruption have better prospects when they emphasize making information public and building systems to reduce the opportunities for corruption.
This study was prepared as part of the Independent Evaluation Group's evaluation of World Bank support for public sector reform. The evaluation focuses on World Bank experience in the period 1999-2006, but also looks further back in the 1990s to cover the full trajectory of World Bank support for these reforms. The evaluation report Public sector reform: What works and why? can be downloaded from IEG's website http://www.worldbank.org/ieg/
Evaluation of the World Bank's Support for Public Sector Reform
Start: Jun. 2007 (Completed)
Keywords: Developing countries, transitionary countries, corruption, transparency, public sector, evaluation
John Butterworth, Alana Potter (2014) Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Practice Insight no. 2014:2) 14 p.
S. Webb (team leader), M. Casanegra (tax adm), A. Evans (civil service reform), O.-H. Fjeldstad & J. Isaksen (anticorruption), I. Funke (ass team leader), R. Webb (history), C. Wescott (public financial management) (2008) Washington DC: World Bank (IEG Evaluation Report) 90 p.
Economist focusing on public sector reforms related to taxation, revenue administration, fiscal corruption and capital flight.
CMI Emeritus, economist focusing on poverty, development and public finance.
The Added Value of Value Added Tax: People are more willing to pay tax
Odd-Helge Fjeldstad,Thor Olav Iversen (2015)
To pay or not to pay? Citizens’ attitudes towards taxation in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and South Africa
Merima Ali, Odd-Helge Fjeldstad and Ingrid Hoem Sjursen (2014)
Tax and development: Donor support to strengthen tax systems in developing countries
Odd-Helge Fjeldstad (2014)
Capital flight from Africa - with a little help from the banks
Odd-Helge Fjeldstad and Kari K. Heggstad (2014)