Part of a Special Issue on the 75th Anniversary of the Refugee Convention, this article asks: under what conditions can a state withdraw protection for a person recognized as a refugee under the Convention? It first sets the scene by outlining the broader ‘temporary turn’ in refugee protection in which cessation practice takes place. It then outlines three related developments: 1) the dilution of protection standards in the ‘ceased circumstance’ assessment; 2) the ambivalent treatment of refugees’ attachments to their countries of origin and residence; and 3) the influence of securitization concerns on cessation criteria.

Cessation and the ‘temporary turn’ in asylum law and practice | International Journal of Refugee Law | Oxford Academic

 

 

Publications

CMI Report | 2022

The temporary turn in Norwegian asylum law and practice

In Norway during the 1990s, a concept of temporary protection developed both as a principle of asylum for all refugees and as a tool for facilitating and coordinating asylum in...
Jessica Schultz (2022)
Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI Report R 2022:5) 42 p.
Journal Article | 2025

The temporary turn in asylum: a new agenda for researching the politics of deterrence in practice

While policies of non-admission, deflection and containment have animated Global North states’ response to refugees since the 1980s, the past decade has witnessed a new turn towards post-entry measures making...
Sandberg, Marie and Schultz, Jessica and Syppli Kohl, Katrine (2025)
in Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 1-18 p.