This paper examines the post-war reconstruction programme in Afghanistan, arguing that it contains the seeds of radical social change. The paper analyses the tensions of the present reconstruction project in light of the past experience of similar programmes launched by Afghan rulers and their foreign supporters. The central argument is that the conflation of post-war reconstruction with a broader agenda for development and modernisation has brought out a wide range of tensions associated with social change. Simultaneously the prominent foreign role in the undertaking has increasingly had negative effects. As a result, the entire project shows signs of severe contradictions that are adding to the problems caused by the growing insurgency.
Building a better world by establishing a Truth Commission: Incomplete healing in El Salvador
NGOs and corruption in post-war reconstruction: The case of Bosnia's refugee return
Peace Processes and Statebuilding: Economic and Institutional Provisions of Peace Agreements
Astri Suhrke, Torunn Wimpelmann and Marcia Dawes
When More is Less: Aiding Statebuilding in Afghanistan
Danish-Norwegian Return Center for Minors in Kabul: Well-Founded Initiative?
Jessica Schultz and Terje Einarsen
Missing from the picture: Men imprisoned for ‘moral crimes’ in Afghanistan
Aziz Hakimi, Torunn Wimpelmann