New strategies on international financial crimes must remove implementation barriers, and understand how institutions govern corruption.
Emerging strategies against international financial crimes should avoid the pitfalls of the early anti-corruption movement. Much energy and resources were spent on apparent panaceas that ended up disappointing due to misplaced expectations. The belief that one single institution will solve a complex problem is naive. Both research and practice need to appreciate the interdependencies and synergies between various types of corruption.
Future research and strategies would benefit from adopting an institutionalist lens, to understand why it is so difficult to change corrupt behaviour, and why creating strong institutions to control corruption is paramount. Moreover, the role of implementation should be more appreciated, both in research and actual practice. To learn what works and why, a crucial first step is to know whether initiatives fail due to weak designs or poor implementation. The costs of international financial crimes are not just the direct financial costs, but also the indirect costs that occur as a result of a distortion of public policy and its implementation
Comparing legal activism in Zimbabwe and Zambia
O'Brien Kaaba, Marja Hinfelaar, Tony Zhou
Corruption and climate finance. Implications for climate change interventions
Michael Nest, Saul Mullard, Cecilie Wathne
Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Environmental and Resource Management
Luca Tacconi, David Aled Williams
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Customers play an important role in shaping firms’ VAT compliance
Odd-Helge Fjeldstad, Cecilia Kagoma, Ephraim Mdee, Ingrid Hoem Sjursen & Vincent Somville
Truth and Logic for a More Peaceful World: Kristian Berg Harpviken in Conversation with Arne Strand
Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for revenue generation in poor African countries
Odd-Helge Fjeldstad and Ole Therkildsen