This article looks at co-ordination within humanitarian mine action (hma), and co-ordination between hma and other humanitarian and development initiatives. The discussion focuses specifically on the role of UN-led Mine Action Centres (macs) and the analysis draws on case studies of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Afghanistan. A contention throughout is that macs often employ a rigid approach to co-ordination. This constricts the flexibility of mine action organisations, limits the development of creative initiatives and poses a barrier to co-ordination between hma and other humanitarian initiatives. A second point pursued is that co-ordination arrangements are embedded in a broader institutional context, and this context has in turn the potential to impact on co-ordination. The analysis presented here suggests a number of implications for hma in general, together with a number of policy considerations. The article concludes by offering some thoughts for the future on the importance of effective co-ordination arrangements both within hma as a sector and between hma and other sectors of humanitarian assistance.
Twenty Years After Ottawa: ‘Unpacking’ Mine Action in Peace Agreements
Journal of Peacebuilding and Development
Ambigious land ownership in al-Salha, Omdurman: Land grabbing or business as usual?
Anthropology of Law in Muslim Sudan
Exploring the spatio-temporal processes of communal rangeland grabbing in Sudan
Hussein M. Sulieman
The rise and fall of the mining royalty regime in Zambia
Odd-Helge Fjeldstad, Caleb Fundanga and Lise Rakner
Lifting the veil of secrecy: Perspectives on international taxation and capital flight from Africa
The end of protection? Cessation and the ‘return turn’ in refugee law
The “CIA’s Army”: A Threat to Human Rights and an Obstacle to Peace in Afghanistan
Suhrke Astri and Antonio De Lauri