Malawi's democratic Constitution of 1994 shifted the law in a pro-poor direction. With the judiciary emerging as a surprisingly strong institution in an otherwise weak political system, one might expect a body of pro-poor jurisprudence to develop. This has not been the case, and this article investigates why.
Afterconsidering patterns of poverty and the role of law in the dynamicsof economic marginalization in Malawi, we examine factors assumedto influence the use of courts by the economically marginalized,the strength of their legal voice, and the response of the courtsto poor people's social rights claims. We find an interplaybetween factors impeding the demand for pro-poor justice aswell as its supply: lack of litigation resources; high accessbarriers; the pull of alternative institutions; and the natureof Malawi's legal culture.
“The Tipp-Ex election”: Widespread unrest after the 2019 elections in Malawi
Political Corruption in Africa. Extraction and Power Preservation
Inge Amundsen (ed.)
Why campaigns to stop child marriage can backfire
Ragnhild L. Muriaas, Vibeke Wang, Lindsay J. Benstead, Boniface Dulani, Lise Rakner
Introducing post-discharge malaria chemoprevention (PMC) for management of severe anemia in Malawian children: a qualitative study of community health workers’ perceptions and motivation
Thandile Nkosi-Gondwe, Bjarne Robberstad, Björn Blomberg, Kamija S. Phiri, Siri Lange
BMC Health Services Research