Good Governance, Aid Modalities and Poverty Reduction. From Better Theory to Better Practice
Leaders of the world community have committed themselves to providing development assistance on a scale and in a form that enables developing countries to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. In 2008, the international community will come together twice, in Accra in September and Doha in November, to assess the progress made in implementing these commitments.
This report synthesises the findings of a two-year research project commissioned by the Advisory Board for Irish Aid which speaks directly to the agenda of these high-level reviews. The work was undertaken by staff and associates of the Overseas Development Institute, London; the Chr Michelsen Institute, Bergen; the Economic and Social Research Foundation, Dar es Salaam; and the Center for Democratic Development, Accra. It addressed the theme of "Good Governance, Aid Modalities and Poverty Reduction" through eight workpackages - involving desk studies and/or brief fieldwork - on particular topics together with a synthesis study drawing on this and other research.
The report deals with the challenges implicit in the commitment of leading donor agencies, including Irish Aid, to deliver aid for development in ways that help poor countries to "own" their development efforts, by using and helping to strengthen their policy-making capacities and management systems. This is the rationale of General Budget Support and other new aid modalities linked to so-called Programme-Based Approaches. It is also at the centre of the vision of the 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. This approach is strongly grounded in experience and theory, but the practice has proven problematic in a number of respects, raising a series of questions for researchers and development agencies alike. These are addressed in first half of the report (Part 1). If countries are to assume ownership of their development processes, changes in the way they are governed are also required. What this implies donor policies and programming is explored in Part 2.
Main findings of the research
- The implementation of the thinking on new aid modalities has been too cautious and qualified. Even the more progressive donors are tending to adopt half-measures that cannot be expected to yield the desired results.
- Changes in aid practices must be matched by changes on the recipient country side. Donors have a duty to help in this regard too. But this means engaging in new - better-informed, intellectually more modest and sometimes more pro-active - ways in the improvement of governance systems.
- In each of these respects, securing changes in incentives and institutions is more important (relative to merely providing funding) than donor agencies and public opinion in Northern countries have been prepared recognise.
This is the Final Synthesis Report of the project:
Good Governance, Aid Modalities and Poverty Reduction: Linkages to the Millennium Development Goals and Implications for Irish Aid
Research project (RP-05-GG) of the Advisory Board for Irish Aid
Syrian Refugees in Istanbul and Gaziantep: Comparative Findings on Settlement, Livelihood and Support
Ahmet Içduygu, Souad Osseiran
Community-Driven Development or community-based development?
Arne Strand, Magnus Hatlebakk, Torunn Wimpelmann, Mirwais Wardak
Improving Covid-19 vaccine coverage by mitigating corruption risks in the supply chain
Daniela Cepeda Cuadrado, Daniel Sejerøe Hausenkamph
Corruption in the medical supply chain: lessons from the pandemic
Sarah Steingrüber, Muktar Gadanya
Is the system of self-regulation among India’s judges fit for purpose? In-house mechanisms are not the best way to protect judicial independence
Safeguarding the Covid-19 vaccine distribution: Evaluating the role of blockchain
Daniela Cepeda Cuadrado, Daniel Sejerøe Hausenkamph, Per Aarvik, Clara Cardona, Marcelino Turati, Natalia Mejia Pardo
The invisible ceiling: Muslim immigrant entrepreneurs navigate Norway’s financial environment
Mari Norbakk,Sarah A Tobin