This article reviews recent Norwegian aid evaluations with a mandate to study impact, and assesses how the evaluators establish causal effects. The analytical challenges encountered in the seven studies reviewed are:
(1) the Terms of Reference ask for evidence of impact where this is not possible to identify,(2) the distinction between impacts of the aid element versus other components is often blurred, and (3) the methodological approaches to identify impact are either poorly developed or applied superficially.
A main conclusion is that most of the evaluators did not have the necessary time or budget to conduct a proper impact evaluation given the large number of questions raised in the commissioning agency.
Evaluation of Norwegian support to civil society through Norwegian organisations. Report from presentation seminars in Nepal and Ethiopia. April 2018
Elling N Tjønneland, Kanta Singh, Yeraswork Admassie
Midterm Evaluation of NPA-Cambodia Office's Development Programme
Elling N Tjønneland, Pou Sovann
Evaluation of agreement between Norwegian Church Aid and Norad for financial support to Haydom Lutheran Hospital
Evaluation of the Sida supported research capacity and higher education development programme in Rwanda, 2013-2017
Inge Tvedten, Arthur Byabagambi, Johanna Lindström, Matti Tedre
Too big to fault? Effects of the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize on Norwegian exports to China and foreign policy
International Political Science Review