Development, Patronage and Politics: the prospects for Afghanistan
Billions of dollars have been used for development purposes in Afghanistan since 2001, still is the country ranked as 13th last in the UNHDI, down 3 places from last ranking.
Why is that the case: partly because 60 % of these funds have been for security related investments (i..e police), partly due to the fact that it much has been targeted towards areas with a high degree of conflict (winning hearts and minds) and party because ministries and parliament is based on a patronage structure that then prioritise the interest for maintaining their network over national development goals.
Shall development efforts be secured is there a need for prioritisation, as in maintaining and developing quality in health and education, and do far more to generate jobs and invest in long term livelihood development.
Less funds might be a blessing if these are better targeted and shielded from misuse.
Comparing legal activism in Zimbabwe and Zambia
O'Brien Kaaba, Marja Hinfelaar, Tony Zhou
Corruption in customs: How can it be tackled?
Odd-Helge Fjeldstad, Ernani Checcucci Filho and Gaël Raballand
Enhancing Government Effectiveness and Transparency: The Fight Against Corruption
A Theory of Change for the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Designing resource governance pathways to improve developmental outcomes
Philippe Le Billon, Päivi Lujala, Siri Aas Rustad
Twenty years with anti-corruption. Part 8. Working with other parts of government … when they don’t want to work with you
Phil Mason OBE
Understanding the inferno on Lesbos: – We need new perspectives on migration to solve this situation
Women Judges in Afghanistan: An Interview with Anisa Rasooli
Antonio De Lauri
Armed governance: the case of the CIA-supported Afghan militias
Antonio De Lauri, Astri Suhrke
Small Wars and Insurgencies
The Helpers and the Helped: Troubling Ideas of Human Worth in Humanitarianism
Humanitarian Diplomatic Practices
The Hague Journal of Diplomacy
Close your eyes and picture “a humanitarian”. What do you see?