The LoI process was always expected to be a complex and innovative exercise involving many stakeholders and relationships, with progress marked by slow, directional change over a long period. The LoI therefore called for independent reviews, and these occurred in 2011, 2013 and 2018. The present review was done in Indonesia in August 2018, and is based on inputs from around 70 knowledge holders at 40 relevant institutions. Section 1 explains the context, Section 2 summarises the progress made against the various themes and milestones in the LoI, as contained in the terms of reference of the mission, and Section 3 offers a brief discussion of strategic issues, conclusions, and some suggestions for development of the Partnership. The findings are based on the opinions expressed by informants but do not reflect any official position of any institution involved in the REDD+ Partnership or the review.
Development success in perspective: A political economy of REDD+ and corruption in Vietnam
Thu Ba Huynh
National-level corruption risks and mitigation strategies in the implementation of REDD+ in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: An overview of the current situation
REDD Integrity: An evidence based approach to anti-corruption in REDD+
Aled Williams, Kendra Dupuy, Fiona Downs
Towards REDD+ Integrity: Opportunities and Challenges for Indonesia
Ahmad Dermawan, Anna Christina Sinaga
Two steps forward, one step backwards: Indonesia’s winding (anti-)corruption journey
Sofie Arjon Schütte
Routledge Handbook of Corruption in Asia
Corruption in community-driven development. A Kenyan case study with insights from Indonesia
Specialised anti-corruption courts: A comparative mapping
Sofie Arjon Schütte, Matthew C. Stephenson
The political economy of banking in Angola
Manuel Ennes Ferreira and Ricardo Soares de Oliveira
Can Smallholders benefit from the new market opportunities from the extractive industry in Tanzania?
Sosina Bezu, Espen Villanger, Abel Alfred Kinyondo
Rethinking access. Key methodological challenges in studying energy companies.
Müftüoglu IB, Knudsen S, Dale RF, Eiken O, Rajak D, Lange S
Energy Research & Social Science