Between Sharia and CEDAW in Sudan: Islamist women negotiating gender equity
This chapter explores how women’s rights and obligations are understood and negotiated within the context of an Islamic state in Sudan. It particularly deals with the ongoing debate on The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and Sharia (Islamic law). By analyzing a range of Islamist women’s positions, it becomes apparent that they reject CEDAW and gender equality on the one hand, and on the other promote issues which empower women politically and economically in Sudanese state and society.
The chapter concentrates on the views of Islamists who were interviewed for this study during fieldwork in Khartoum state in 2006 through 2011. The Islamists feminists belong to state-supported organizations and political parties: the Sudan Women’s General Union (SWGU), the International Muslim Women’s Union (IMWU), the National Congress Party (the ruling Islamist political party) and the Popular Congress Party (the Islamist party in opposition).
The chapter puts emphasis on the socioeconomic and political contexts of disputes and negotiations over women’s rights and duties in Islamic law as exposed in the debate on CEDAW. For many international development agencies and Western donors Sharia is regarded as anti-women and an obstacle to women’s empowerment and equality. Islamists postulate a view which promotes women’s empowerment within an Islamic frame. Putting an emphasis on gender equity (insaf), they bargain with patriarchy and negotiate gender relations employing both legal norms originating from Sharia and CEDAW. These negotiations are linked both to Western colonial rule in the past and Western aid donors, peacekeepers and development agencies in the present. The result is that Islamist women advocate equality in rights in the public sphere, including politics and even the military. Within the family, however, male guardianship remains the rule.
Gender justice and legal pluralities. Latin American and African perspectives
Sieder, Rachel and John-Andrew McNeish
Also in this volume:
- The gender of law: Politics, memory and agency in Mozambican community courts
Bertelsen, Bjørn Enge
- Sexual violence and gendered subjectivities: indigenous women's search for justice in Guatemala
- An accumulated rage: Legal pluralism and gender justice in Bolivia
McNeish, John-Andrew and Ana Cecilia Arteaga Börth
Sexual violence does not stop Sudan's women from speaking up
Liv Tønnessen and Samia al-Nagar
Seksuell vold skremmer ikke Sudans kvinner fra gatedemonstasjoner
“I’m against all of the laws of this regime”: What Sudan’s women want
Samia al-Nagar and Liv Tønnessen
Que veulent les femmes qui participent à la révolution au Soudan ?
Samia al-Nagar and Liv Tønnessen
The right to abortion in Tunisia after the revolution of 2011: Legal, medical and social arrangements seen through seven abortion stories
Irene Maffi and Malika Affes
Health and Human Rights Journal
Gender parity and the symbolic representation of women in Senegal
The Journal of Modern African Studies
Legal pluralism and fragmented sovereignties: legality and illegality in Latin America
The Handbook of Law and Society in Latin America