A comparison of U4 partner agencies’ anti-corruption strategies shows that while they take different shapes, their purpose, content and approach is similar. Emphasis is placed on safeguarding donor funds and guiding support for anti-corruption interventions. They also signal a commitment to anti-corruption within the agency, to their domestic audience and partner countries. To go beyond mere rhetoric, strategies need to be properly resourced. Mainstreaming anti-corruption through other strategies and guidelines can potentially create greater integration. Comprehensive anti-corruption strategies run the risk of being viewed as separate from an agency’s overall work. Balancing risk management and zero tolerance in agency strategies emerges as a central issue.
Donors and "zero tolerance for corruption": From principle to practice
Francesco De Simone, Nils Taxell
Truth and Logic for a More Peaceful World: Kristian Berg Harpviken in Conversation with Arne Strand
The conservation-corruption conundrum: Understanding everyday relationships between rangers and communities
Tackling forestry corruption in Indonesia. Lessons from KPK prosecutions
Sofie Arjon Schütte, Laode M. Syarif