Evaluation of Finnish Development Research 1998-2007
This evaluation covered development research funded by the Finnish development cooperation budget during the years 1998-2007:
- Allocations through the Academy of Finland;
- Research projects of Finnish universities and research institutes;
- Commissioned research funded directly by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs;
- Support to research programmes under the UN system (including GCIAR institutions);
- Support to other international research institutions and international non-governmental organisations.
The purpose of the evaluation was to contribute to guidelines and recommendations to improving the funded research activities and outputs:
- To improve the relevance of Finnish development research to Finnish development policy;
- To raise awareness about the usefulness of development research and improve the availability of research reports; and
- To increase the utilisation of research results in development cooperation and in the debate on development aid in general, both in Finland and in partner countries.
Desk review of previous background studies; interviews with key desk officers and advisors, and institutional visits.
The evaluation concluded that the commissioned research is of good academic quality, but largely fails to provide operational advice. The universities are important stakeholders in Finnish development research, and research schools are an important part of the national academic infrastructure. The Academy of Finland is the most important source of project grants for development research.
The main problems identified by the evaulation were concerned with commissioned research and research cooperation. The evaluation recommended that commissioned research were replaced by formative process research, to make the connection between research, planning, implementation and monitoring of development interventions more explicit. All projects supported should be required to produce short policy briefs. The main challenge identified by the evaluation was research cooperation.
There is general policy agreement about the importance of research cooperation, yet the support structures put in place for that purpose are inadequate, concluded the report. There is an urgent need for encouraging and accommodating research collaboration between Finland and the South, either by rationalising and restructuring existing arrangements or by introducing a new instrument customised for this purpose. UniPID could be a suitable partner in that endeavour, drawing on experiences from other Nordic countries, concludes the evaluation team.
Report to client.
Read the complete evaluation report:
Supercamp: The Middle East as a Regional Zone of Containment
Are John Knudsen, Kjersti G. Berg
Gains of the Unfeasible: Manifestations of ‘Leave No One Behind’ in the United Nations’ Humanitarianism
قضات زن در افغانستان: مصاحبه ای با انیسه رسولی – Women Judges in Afghanistan: An Interview with Anisa Rasooli
Antonio De Lauri
Political Economy of Palestine. Critical, Interdisciplinary and Decolonial Perspective
Kjersti G. Berg
Book Notes - Journal of Peace Research
A globalised practice of local peace agreements
Christine Bell, Laura Wise, Juline Beaujouan, Tim Epple, Robert Forster, Robert Wilson
Local Peace Processes
Controlled Religious Plurality: Possibilities for Covenantal Pluralism in Vietnam
The Review of Faith & International Affairs
Competitive Clientelism in Secondary Cities: Urban Ecologies of Resistance in Lebanon
Are John Knudsen
Third World Thematics (TWT)
Norwegian development assistance in support of social safety nets
Corruption definitions and their implications for targeting natural resource corruption
David Aled Williams