Uruguay remains an anomaly in Latin America both with respect to its democratic political system and with respect to how it has dealt with the violence committed under military rule (1973-85). It is the only country in Latin America – indeed in the world – that has had four separate attempts at setting up a truth commission, with or without the State’s backup. It is also the only country in the world which has not once, but twice, democratically refused to revoke an amnesty law designed to protect the military from criminal prosecution for the violations that took place during the civilian-military dictatorship (1973-85). Yet, Uruguay is arguably now one of the forerunners in the region with respect to prosecutorial justice, where a former head of state as well as other prominent military have been convicted and imprisoned for gross human rights violations. This paper takes stock of how these multiple transitional justice efforts have affected peace and the process of democratic (re)construction in Uruguay.
Building a better world by establishing a Truth Commission: Incomplete healing in El Salvador
Transitional Justice for Human Rights: The Legacy and Future of Truth and Reconciliation Commissions
International Human Rights Institutions, Tribunals, and Courts. International Human Rights
Family law reform in Sudan: competing claims for gender justice between sharia and women’s human rights
Samia El Nagar, Liv Tønnessen
Kriser og kriger – er det bruk for oss nå?
Norsk antropologisk tidsskrift
What causes Latin America’s high incidence of adolescent pregnancy?
Camila Gianella, Marta Rodriguez de Assis Machado, Angelica Peñas Defago
Uruguay: halfway towards accountability
Francesca Lessa and Elin Skaar
Transitional Justice in Latin America. The Uneven Road from Impunity towards Accountability
Uruguay: reconstructing peace and democracy through transitional justice
After Violence: Transitional Justice, Peace, and Democracy
A way out of violent conflict. The impact of transitional justice on peace and democracy
Elin Skaar, Camila Gianella Malca and Trine Eide
The International Protection Alternative in Refugee Law: Treaty basis and scope of application under the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol
Love in Law – The Indian Supreme Court decides in favour of LGBT persons